Anomaly in annual increment arising due to the implementation of 6th Central Pay Commission Recommendations
The point regarding the anomaly relating to Rule 9 of the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008, concerning the date of next increment has been discussed in second Anomaly Committee meeting held on 27th March 2010. According to the Minutes of the meeting, Published by DOP&T on 4th May 2010, the Staff Side reiterated their demand that employees whose date of next increment falls between 1st February to 1st June may be given an increment, as a onetime measure, in the pre revised pay scales on 1.1.2006 as has already been done in respect of employees whose next date of increment was 1.1.2006.
The representatives of the Department of Expenditure stated that it is important to first examine the repercussions of granting an increment w.e.f 1. 1. 2006 in the pre revised pay scale because such a decision may eventually lead to certain other anomalies. After a long discussion, it was agreed that the Official Side would re- examine the matter and either suitable clarification in this regard will be issued before the next meeting of the National Anomaly Committee or if there is a need, the Department of Expenditure shall discuss the matter again with the representatives of the Staff Side.
But ,as agreed by the official side,the suitable clarification not been issued till now .
One of our viewer Ms.Pushpa Malhotra,writes her views regarding Pay anomaly in annual increment arising due to the implementation of 6th Central Pay Commission Recommendations .
Dear Sir,
I like to invite government’s kind attention to the minutes of the second meeting of National Anomoly Committee held on 27th March,2010 and like to convey my sincere gratitude as an individual for the concern shown by Govt. representatives and representatives of Staff side in resolving the anomalies out of 6th CPC.
While discussing the Agenda No.5 (v), the representatives of the Govt. had expressed apprehension that granting an increment w.e.f. 01.01.2006 in pre-revised pay- scale to those employees whose date of next increment falls between 1st February to 1st June, as a one time measure may eventually lead to certain anomalies and therefore proposal had to be examined first. In this connection, I would like to submit that by all probabilities, it may not create anomaly because the seniors got this benefit by taking the increment on or before 01.01.2006. However more realistic approach could be to revise the pay on the date of increment / promotion between 01.02.2006 to 01.06.2006 and allow the next increment on 01.07.2006. In this case the employees may forego the arrears for the period from 01.01.2006 till revision of pay as they will draw pre-revised pay till then.
I hope the official side will come out with an appropriate solution to solve the anomaly. Needful to mention that my increment date was 01.02.2006 and retirement date falls on 31st March. The increment drawn for the period from 01.02.2006 to 30.06.2006, 01.02.2007 to 30.06.2007 and 01.02.2008 to 30.06.2008 in the pre-revised grade have been withdrawn and my arrears were very less than my juniors due to postponement of increment dates. Besides, it will effect my pensionary benefits because my retirement date falls on 31st March, whereas before 6th CPC, the increment date was 1st February i.e. before my retirement and my pension would have fixed after drawal of increment.
I hope, the Govt. will consider the issue sympathatically and issue necessary orders to settle the anomaly so that we are not put to regular financial loss, including pensionary benefits.
(Pushpa Malhotra)
Assistant,
National Council for Cooperative Training,
Under M/o Agriculture, (Deptt. of Agril. & Coopn.)
Source: GServants
Rule 5 of CCS(RP)2008 already permitted to revise pay from the date of increment or promotion for those employees whose increment or promotion falls between 2-1-2006 to 30-6-2006 with foregoing arrears whereas Rule 10 stated that employees completing 6 months and above in the revised pay structure as on 1st July will be eligible to be granted the increment. As such completion of 6 months period to earn an increment is mandatory under Rule 10. Therefore, necessary amendment to Rule 10 would be required before allowing 1st July 2006 increment for the above category of employees.At least such employees who ceased or retired from service may be allowed to earn increment without disturbing their date of increment in the revised pay structure by way of amending Rule 10 immediately.
ReplyDeleteIt's nice to see this anomaly for the employees whose DNI falls between 1st February to 1st june (Pre-Revised scale). There should be some thing done these employees. I addition, I would like to have attention of the authority for those employees too, who got promoted between 2nd January 2006 to 31st Jan 2006 and opted 6cpc from the date of promotion. These employees also got the next increment after a period of 17-18 months which is not justifiable. so, these employees should also be treated in the same manner as the employees whose DNI falls between 1st February to 1st June.
ReplyDeleteHope the staff side will raise this issue too and Anomaly committee will accept it.
Thanking you
The official should not be having any apprehension that there will be anamolies by antedating the increment date of as a one time measure to 01-01-2006 in respect of those upto june 2006 as has been done under Rule 10 for jan 2006 increment. In fact lot of anamolies have arisen due to application of rule 10 only and there is no clause in note 10 under Rule 7 to step up pay of senior on par with junior for anamolies arising out of rule 10. this point needs to be clarified to the official side.
ReplyDeleteAll those employees who complete 12 month after promotion/annual increment before July 2007 should get one increment either from the date of implementation of 6CPC or from 1st July 2006.
ReplyDeleteTHIS IS A VITAL ISSUE. ALL EMPLOYEES FRATERNITY SHOULD RAISE VOICE TO GIVE INCREMENTAL EFFECT FROM 01.01.2006, TO THOSE WHOES PREVISED DATE OF INCREMENT FALLS BETEEN JAN TO JUNE.THIS HAS A GREAT IMPACT NOT ONLY ON MONTHLY SALARY BUT ALSO ON THE PENSION, RETIREMENT BENEFITS. ALL ASSOCIATIONS IRRESPECTIVE OF OFFICER AND STAFF SHOULD UNITEDLY DEMAND FOR EFFECTING SAID INCREMENTAL BENEFITS WITH EFFECT FROM 01.01.2006 FOR THOSE WHOSE PRE-REVISED INCREMENT FALLS BETWEEN JAN TO JUNE.
ReplyDeleteThe anomali of DNI must be settled. All employees must get annual icrement who have completed their 12 months service before July 2006 instead of a period more than 12 months.
ReplyDeleteit is just like implimentation of major penalty as increament is posponded with cumulative effect.so as demanded by unions,one increament as one time measure on 1/1/06 in pre-revised scale is only solution.other recomentation proposed by the Madom will cause further anomaly especially inclusion of promotees of thease period.
ReplyDeleteI am a central Govt. Employee. I want to know How to claim for TADa in case I have lost the Original Rail tickets for journey for attending a training course. I have no idea about this ticket.
ReplyDeleteEmployees whose DNI falls between 1st February to 1st June
ReplyDeleteDear Sir,
I like to invite government’s kind attention to the minutes of the second meeting of National Anomoly Committee held on 27th March,2010 and like to convey my sincere gratitude as an individual for the concern shown by Govt. representatives and representatives of Staff side in resolving the anomalies out of 6th CPC.
While discussing the Agenda No.5 (v), the representatives of the Govt. had expressed apprehension that granting an increment w.e.f. 01.01.2006 in pre-revised pay- scale to those employees whose date of next increment falls between 1st February to 1st June, as a one time measure may eventually lead to certain anomalies and therefore proposal had to be examined first. In this connection, I would like to submit that by all probabilities, it may not create anomaly because the seniors got this benefit by taking the increment on or before 01.01.2006. However more realistic approach could be to revise the pay on the date of increment / promotion between 01.02.2006 to 01.06.2006 and allow the next increment on 01.07.2006. In this case the employees may forego the arrears for the period from 01.01.2006 till revision of pay as they will draw pre-revised pay till then.
I hope the official side will come out with an appropriate solution to solve the anomaly. Needful to mention that my increment date was 0n1.05.06.The increment drawn for the period from 01.05.2006 to 30.06.2006, 01.05.2007 to 30.06.2007 and 01.05.2008 to 30.06.2008 in the pre-revised grade have been withdrawn and my arrears were very less than my juniors due to postponement of increment .
I hope, the Govt. will consider the issue sympathatically and issue necessary orders to settle the anomaly so that we are not put to regular financial loss, including pensionary benefi
(AJAY SURI)
Pharmacist
Extra Divisional Railway Hospital
Northern Railway
Jagadhri Workshop
District Yamuna nagar
MOB 9896032085,9729537299
Respected sir,
ReplyDeleteThe prominent thing which comes to mind in MACP is its date effect It is from date of issue of order.The effective date is causing many disparities in amount of pension of those who ceased to be in service between 01/01/2006 to 09/09/2008. and after 09/09/2008. Perhaps u also know this fact. It will be better if Govt. makes effective from 01/01/2006 for the purpose of fixation of notional pay and gives benefit in pension
S D KAHALEY
NAGPUR
18/10/2010
Dear sir,
ReplyDeleteIt is the case with me also ie, my date of next increament was 1-3-2006 and retirement date is also April.
Due to this, either I got an increament in March 2006 nor will going to get before retirement.
This anomoly need to be rectified either by allowing advance increament as on 1-1-2006 or on 1-3-2006 as a one time measure. Out of two any date is OK.
dear sir,
ReplyDeletePlease find a solution to the officers whose DNI lies between 1-1-2006 to 30-6-2006 at the earliest
s. shekhar
the deadline for giving fresh option is 31-12-10. by the inaction of the anomoly committee authorities and keeping "MUM' a situation has been created for the employees who are in this catagory to exercise the option by forgoing arrear benefits or to wait for the authorities to act and to say YES OR NO finally.
ReplyDeleteThe deadline date for exercising fresh option is 31-12-10. The anomaly committee members should not be inactive and keep mum on this issue and come out with clear order very soon to avoid further confusions.
ReplyDeleteI am a Assistant Field Officer/Telecommunication in Sashastra seema bal. My grade pay is 2400 whereas the same rank of this department and other department i.s. Intelligence buearu and Ra&W is 2800/-. kindly give a solutaion about this matter
ReplyDeletefrom shyamal sarkar
assistant field officer(telecom)
sashastra seema bal
Sir,
ReplyDeleteThe anomaly regarding stepping up of pay according to Item No.19 reflected in the statement indicating the gist of decisions taken during the Second Meeting of the Joint Committee on MACPS held on 15/09/10 circulated under DOPT OM No.11/1/2010-JCA dt 06 Oct 10, arised due to withdrawal of increment from employees whose increment dates falls between 01 Feb 2006 to 30 Jun 2006 in the pre-revised scale of pay. However, if the Govt. would grant one increment as on 01/01/2006 in the pre-revised scale of pay, to employees who were due for Annual Increment between 01/02/06 to 30/06/06 as in the case of persons whose increment date was on 01 Jan 2006 as one time measure, many cases pertaining to stepping up can be resolved.
The minimum pay for employees appointed in Govt. Service after 01/01/2006 has been specified in the CCS (RP) Rules 2008 according to Grade Pay. Whether, the same is applicable to promotees (who have promoted after 01/01/06 and drawing pay less than the minimum prescribed with GP) also under FR-22(I)(a)(1).
Further, I would like to ask the Govt.Authorities that despite, accepted by the 6th CPC to merge the pre-revise Pay Scales of Rs.5000-8000/- and Rs.5500-9000/- into Rs.6500-10500/- Wef.01/01/2006, why the pay of the affected employees have been fixed less than the minimum of Rs.12090/- (ie. Rs.6500 x 1.86) by depriving the existing fundamental rules and constitutional rights of officials. Apart from the above, Govt. is not maintaining parity in pay of employees between Secretariate & Non-Secretariate departments, as per the decision of the 6th CPC. Whether, the Govt. of India has gone so injustice to its employees. As a result of this iniquity of Govt., employees like me, who have rendered 30 years long service, are facing the loss of huge amount (ie. Rs.4000/- to Rs.5000/-) every month in our salaries and it will effect in pension also.
In view of the above, I solicit to the Authorities of Govt. & National Anomaly Committee to take appropriate action
to settle the long pending pay anomalies of 6th CPC soon to get relief to serving as well as retiring officials of the
Govt. of India.
Thanks, Jai Hind. SOMI
I Joined Govt organization on 15 Feb 2010. Will I get first increment from 15 feb 2011 or from 1 July 2011 after implementation of this rule?
ReplyDeleteChairman and Members of NAC and also National JCM. Prior to 6th cpc my increment was in Feb. After drawing Feb 2005 inrement I got myincrement in July 2006 i.e. 5 months delay. I have superannuated on June 30th 2010. Again for my 12 months service no increment. Total 17 months service no increment. Is it not an anomaly? Why one time increment issue is taking its of time in NAC?
ReplyDeleteThere is a simple way to remove the anamony by giving increment on pro-rata basis.Allow increment @ 1/12 of icrement amount for each month.
ReplyDeleteThere is a simple way to resolve the anamony by giving increment on pro rata basis (@1/12 of increment amount for every month)
ReplyDeleteIf this anamoly is not solved by the Min of Fin,the affected employees will suffer for this in the next Pay Commission.
ReplyDelete